RevParPro · Portfolio Management
A read of the three Houston property briefs sent Thu Aug 13, 2026 at 9:01 AM CT. All three flag the same headline, "you are below the compset median." That call is right for one property, overstated for a second, and built on broken inventory for the third.
Tonight we are rank 9 of 9 and $2 below the lowest competitor, at 35% on the books (Spark 425368). On Tue 8/18 we sit at $92 against a low comp of $94 (Spark 425368). Being the cheapest hotel in the market bought nothing. There is no cost to pulling back up to the floor.
The "$30 below Mid" flag on Tue 8/18 and Wed 8/19 (Spark 425369) is inflated by four comps a full tier above us. And Marriott's own forecast says ADR is $4.84 over budget while occupancy is 12.0 points under (Spark 425369). This is a volume miss, not a rate miss.
The brief shows 104 to 115 rooms left to sell on Aug 17 to Aug 20 (Spark 425367). The night audit says 24 of 127 rooms have been out of order since Aug 10 (RevParPro night_audit_current, business dates 2026-08-09 through 2026-08-12). The brief is not netting them out.
Same morning, same market, three very different situations. Every figure below is quoted from the brief for that property unless marked otherwise.
| Measure | HOURP | HOUZN | HOUUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rooms | 190 | 139 | 127 |
| Out of order, night of Aug 12 | 11 | 2 | 24 |
| Tonight, on the books | 70% | 35% | 40% |
| Tonight, our rate | $114 | $107 | $99 |
| Tonight, compset median | $135 | $124 | $101 |
| Tonight, rank in set | 6 of 8 | 9 of 9 | 4 of 6 |
| Tonight vs the cheapest comp | at the floor | $2 below | $27 above |
| August room revenue budget | $493,245 | $280,188 | $216,178 |
| Covered today, actual plus on the books | 65% | 61% | 53% |
| Brand forecast, share of budget | 88% | 84% | 86% |
| Brand forecast shortfall | $58,820 | $43,588 | $29,401 |
| ADR vs budget | +$4.84 | -$4.40 | -$3.94 |
| Occupancy vs budget | -12.0 pts | -7.0 pts | -5.7 pts |
| Where the miss is | volume only | both | both |
Sources: rooms, out of order from RevParPro night_audit_current business date 2026-08-12 and Houston Market Pulse (Spark 425315). All rate, on the books, budget, forecast and variance figures from the three briefs (Spark 425369, 425368, 425367).
The median arithmetic in the briefs is correct. The problem is that a median is a poor anchor when the compset splits into two tiers that do not compete for the same guest. HOURP on Tue 8/18 is the clearest case.
| Hotel | Rate | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Hilton Garden Inn | $159 | upper tier |
| Staybridge Suites | $140 | upper tier |
| Hyatt Place | $139 | upper tier |
| Hampton | $131 | upper tier |
| Compset median, the "Mid" the brief compares us to | $131 | |
| Holiday Inn Express | $110 | our tier |
| Courtyard | $103 | our tier |
| SpringHill Med Center, us | $101 | our tier |
| Holiday Inn | $93 | our tier |
Rates from the HOURP brief, Tue 8/18 row (Spark 425369). DoubleTree at $139 and Residence Inn at $152 are excluded from the median by the brief's own footer and are omitted here for the same reason.
The brief says "rate opportunity, $30 below Mid." Closing that gap means pricing above Hampton and level with Hyatt Place, which will not hold on a Tuesday at 48% on the books (Spark 425369). The honest headroom is the next comp up, Holiday Inn Express at $110, which is $9, not $30. Same shape at HOUUS: its compset is barbelled at $67 and $72 on the low end against $108, $109 and $128 on the high end (Spark 425367, Tue 8/18 row), so the $108 median is a price no one in that market is actually transacting at.
The rank line is doing the honest work
Every brief already carries the number that matters. HOUZN at rank 9 of 9 and $2 below the lowest comp is a genuine alarm. HOURP at rank 6 of 8, tied at the floor tonight, is not the same story as "$21 below Mid" implies. Rank should lead, the median gap should be a footnote.
Each brief tells the reader how much revenue is left to sell and how many rooms are open, but never connects them. Here is what closing to budget would actually require over the 18 nights remaining.
| Property | Revenue still to sell | At forecast ADR | Room nights needed | Per night | Nightly occupancy that implies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOURP | $173,720 | $114.11 | 1,522 | 85 | 45 points on top of current pace |
| HOUZN | $109,122 | $107.99 | 1,010 | 56 | 40 points on top of current pace |
| HOUUS | $100,635 | $91.83 | 1,096 | 61 | 59 points on sellable rooms |
Revenue still to sell, forecast ADR and the 18 nights remaining are quoted from each brief (Spark 425369, 425368, 425367). Room nights, per night and implied occupancy are derived: revenue divided by forecast ADR, divided by 18 nights, divided by rooms (190, 139, and for HOUUS the 103 sellable rooms after 24 out of order per night_audit_current 2026-08-12).
Against that, current daily pickup across all three briefs runs between zero and six rooms a night (Spark 425369, 425368, 425367). Budget is not reachable at any of the three. The useful question this morning is not whether Tue 8/18 was priced right, it is how much of a $131,809 combined brand-forecast shortfall (derived: $58,820 plus $43,588 plus $29,401, each from its brief) can still be recovered, and rate moves of $10 to $20 on 90 unsold rooms are not the lever that does it.
HOUUS lost 23 rooms of inventory overnight on Aug 10, from 2 out of order to 25 (night_audit_current, business dates 2026-08-09 and 2026-08-10), and the daily brief never noticed.
| Business date | Total rooms | Occupied | Out of order | Left to sell, per night audit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6 | 127 | 57 | 4 | 66 |
| Aug 7 | 127 | 109 | 2 | 16 |
| Aug 8 | 127 | 114 | 4 | 9 |
| Aug 9 | 127 | 50 | 2 | 75 |
| Aug 10 | 127 | 51 | 25 | 51 |
| Aug 11 | 127 | 64 | 25 | 38 |
| Aug 12 | 127 | 66 | 24 | 37 |
RevParPro table night_audit_current, property HOUUS, business dates 2026-08-06 through 2026-08-12.
The forward table in the HOUUS brief takes rooms left to sell as total rooms minus rooms sold, gross of out of order. HOUUS has 127 rooms (RevParPro hotels table) and 24 of them are out of order (night_audit_current 2026-08-12), so 103 are sellable. On Tue 8/18 the brief nonetheless prints a left to sell figure of 108 (Spark 425367), which exceeds the sellable count by 5.
The HOURP brief applies the opposite rule and nets out of order rooms out: it shows 47 open tonight, where 190 rooms minus 133 sold would give 57 (Spark 425369; booking_pace report date 2026-08-13 records 133 sold on 190 available). Two properties, two rules, and the one with 24 rooms down is the one getting the wrong one.
The practical damage: HOUUS reads 24 rooms softer every night than it is, which is exactly the signal that pushes a GM to discount. Its rate is already $88 on Aug 17 to Aug 19 (Spark 425367).
Separate from the emails, an ops item
37 rooms across the Houston portfolio are out of order, 24 at HOUUS and 11 at HOURP and 2 at HOUZN, against 456 total rooms (night_audit_current 2026-08-12; portfolio room count from Houston Market Pulse, Spark 425315). That is 8.1% of the portfolio offline heading into the back half of August, and the Market Pulse notes both HOUUS and HOURP have had rooms down for 28 or more nights (Spark 425315). Recovering those rooms is worth more than any rate decision in these three emails.
One rule across all properties. Until this ships, the HOUUS brief should not be trusted on open inventory, and anyone reading it should subtract the 24 out of order rooms from the open inventory it shows (night_audit_current 2026-08-12).
Where the compset splits into two tiers, replace the raw median with the nearest comp above us, or trim the outliers before taking the median. "You are $9 under Holiday Inn Express" is actionable. "You are $30 under Mid" sends a GM chasing a price that will not book.
HOURP's ADR is beating budget by $4.84 while occupancy trails by 12.0 points (Spark 425369). The brief should say "volume problem" at the top rather than opening with three rate opportunities. Adding the required nightly pace from section 04 would turn the brief from a report into a decision.